JEP proposed to target JDK 11: 318: Epsilon: An Arbitrarily Low-Overhead Garbage Collector (original) (raw)
Erik Österlund erik.osterlund at oracle.com
Thu Jan 18 09:26:53 UTC 2018
- Previous message: JEP proposed to target JDK 11: 318: Epsilon: An Arbitrarily Low-Overhead Garbage Collector
- Next message: JEP proposed to target JDK 11: 318: Epsilon: An Arbitrarily Low-Overhead Garbage Collector
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
This is not a garbage collector, because it does not collect garbage. It is an allocator. Therefore, I also think the -XX:+UseNoGC name is more descriptive. Also, is this what it always feels like to write short emails?
Thanks, /Erik
On 2018-01-18 10:12, Stefan Johansson wrote:
On 2018-01-17 10:43, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: On 01/17/2018 12:50 AM, charlie hunt wrote: Seems with what is being proposed is essentially a “no GC” type of ability … a command line option of -XX:+NoGC or -XX:+UseNoGC would probably be better understood as to what it generally does, and the consequence of exhausting Java heap space since there is “no GC”. How very unpoetical :) Epsilon has the origin story for its name, see the JEP. Most people, including prospective users, know this feature under "Epsilon" and some expressed the love for the name. So, as long as there is no overwhelming amount of strong opinions against it, I'd keep the name as is. I'm with Charlie here, I think -XX:+UseNoGC would be better and much more descriptive name for this feature. Stefan -Aleksey
- Previous message: JEP proposed to target JDK 11: 318: Epsilon: An Arbitrarily Low-Overhead Garbage Collector
- Next message: JEP proposed to target JDK 11: 318: Epsilon: An Arbitrarily Low-Overhead Garbage Collector
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]