Future jdk9u updates & 9-critical-request (original) (raw)
Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Fri Jan 26 10:03:12 UTC 2018
- Previous message: Future jdk9u updates & 9-critical-request
- Next message: Future jdk9u updates & 9-critical-request
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 25/01/18 18:19, Martin Buchholz wrote:
There is enough interest in jdk9 that at least minimal community maintenance should be possible.
Maybe. I have no interest in doing it because I believe that the LTS/STS model is a good one, so the STS releases really should be short term. I don't mind being jdk9u lead for the ten minutes it takes to fix the breakage and tag the tree for a release.
-- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
- Previous message: Future jdk9u updates & 9-critical-request
- Next message: Future jdk9u updates & 9-critical-request
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]