Backporting changeset from 7 to 6 for bugfix (original) (raw)

Joe Darcy joe.darcy at oracle.com
Fri Jun 11 12:54:26 PDT 2010

Andrew John Hughes wrote:

On 11 June 2010 05:31, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:

Joe Darcy wrote:

Andrew John Hughes wrote:

On 10 June 2010 02:02, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:

Andrew Su wrote: [snip] changeset: 2208:0137b5857c63 parent: 2183:90248595ec35 user: okutsu date: Wed Mar 10 14:32:47 2010 +0900 summary: 6932473: (tz) javazic produces incorrect SimpleTimeZone parameters with Sun<=7 Do these look ok?

Yes; also approved to go back. Since some Sun copyrighted files have leaked back in, we'll done another pass to clean up any such files before b20 goes final. Thanks, -Joe I think only a few more changes are needed to wrap up b20: * The various backports identified in the earlier message in this thread Done now. * Backport of 6957375 "java/net/ResponseCache getResponseCode and ResponseCacheTest fail after rebranding" I see this come in while I was backporting; had to merge. * One more pass of the Sun -> Oracle copyright script There are some new Zero bugfixes that could be backported for b20 (and would allow us to drop the local copy in IcedTea6). I've CCed Gary Benson who should be able to provide a list of bug IDs for backport. Other than that, we should be good to go with b20.

Being able to drop the copy of Zero in IcedTea sounds worthwhile. After looking over the bugids and a webrev, I'd expect to approve those fixes going back.

The Zero fixes are the last currently planned fixes for b20.

-Joe

More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list