Backporting changeset from 7 to 6 for bugfix (original) (raw)

Andrew John Hughes ahughes at redhat.com
Tue Jun 15 08:30:15 PDT 2010

On 15 June 2010 13:21, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote: > On 15 June 2010 01:10, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote: >> Joe Darcy wrote: >>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11 June 2010 05:31, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Darcy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 June 2010 02:02, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Su wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [snip] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changeset:   2208:0137b5857c63 >>>>>>> parent:      2183:90248595ec35 >>>>>>> user:        okutsu >>>>>>> date:        Wed Mar 10 14:32:47 2010 +0900 >>>>>>> summary:     6932473: (tz) javazic produces incorrect SimpleTimeZone >>>>>>> _parameters with Sun<=7_ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do these look ok? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes; also approved to go back. >>>>>>>>>>>> Since some Sun copyrighted files have leaked back in, we'll done >>>>>> another >>>>>> pass to clean up any such files before b20 goes final. >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think only a few more changes are needed to wrap up b20: >>>>>>>>>> * The various backports identified in the earlier message in this thread >>>>>>>>>>>>> Done now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Backport of 6957375 "java/net/ResponseCache getResponseCode and >>>>> ResponseCacheTest fail after rebranding" >>>>>>>>>>>>> I see this come in while I was backporting; had to merge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * One more pass of the Sun -> Oracle copyright script >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are some new Zero bugfixes that could be backported for b20 (and >>>> would allow us to drop the local copy in IcedTea6). >>>> I've CCed Gary Benson who should be able to provide a list of bug IDs >>>> for backport. >>>>>>>> Other than that, we should be good to go with b20. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to drop the copy of Zero in IcedTea sounds worthwhile.  After >>> looking over the bugids and a webrev, I'd expect to approve those fixes >>> going back. >>>>>> The Zero fixes are the last currently planned fixes for b20. >>>>>> -Joe >>>> Hello. >>>> I'd like to get b20 wrapped up in the next day or two; please provide a list >> of the Zeros bug and I webrev so I can look them over. >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Joe >>>> I was waiting for a response from Gary with the bug IDs, but looks > like one isn't forthcoming.  I'll compile a list from recent OpenJDK7 > build drops and post that shortly. >> There's also http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-June/001750.html > which causes build breakage with IcedTea. > -- > Andrew :-) >> Free Java Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) >> Support Free Java! > Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK > http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath > http://openjdk.java.net >> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) > Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 > b87

6934089 Zero 32-bit/64kb page fix http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/da06d1795d84

b90

6939180 Zero locking fix http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/747d26efc5fa

b92

6941224: Improved stack overflow handling for Zero http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/f9271ff9d324

6944503: Improved Zero crash dump http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/c544d979f886

6944473: 6941224 misses new files http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/aa9c266de52a

b94

6939182: Zero JNI handles fix http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/0c5b3cf3c1f5

6950178: Zero stack improvements http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/348346af6676

6950617: Zero/Shark interface updates http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/6cfbdb113e52

6951784: Zero deoptimizer changes http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/22af4ce8dba1

b96

6951686: Using large pages on Linux prevents zero based compressed oops http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/79bf863697eb

Here's the webrev for those: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/zero/webrev.05/ and the previous Nimbus one: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/nimbus/webrev.07/

The following were skipped due to the referenced changesets not being in OpenJDK6:

6939731: JSR 292 Zero build fix after 6934494 6944028: 6940701 broke Zero 6949830: 6939134 broke Zero

6949423: remove tagged stack interpreter for Zero http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/68d6683eaef7 Depends on: changeset: 1426:2338d41fbd81 user: twisti date: Fri Apr 30 08:37:24 2010 -0700 summary: 6943304: remove tagged stack interpreter

-- Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8

More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list