Backporting changeset from 7 to 6 for bugfix (original) (raw)

Andrew John Hughes ahughes at redhat.com
Thu Jun 17 10:39:30 PDT 2010

On 17 June 2010 17:38, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>> On 17 June 2010 10:20, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 17 June 2010 09:41, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 17 June 2010 09:02, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 June 2010 00:59, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16 June 2010 01:54, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2010 16:30, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2010 13:21, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2010 01:10, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Darcy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11 June 2010 05:31, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Darcy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 June 2010 02:02, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Su wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [snip] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changeset:   2208:0137b5857c63 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parent:      2183:90248595ec35 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user:        okutsu >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date:        Wed Mar 10 14:32:47 2010 +0900 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> summary:     6932473: (tz) javazic produces incorrect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SimpleTimeZone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _parameters with Sun<=7_ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do these look ok? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes; also approved to go back. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since some Sun copyrighted files have leaked back in, we'll >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass to clean up any such files before b20 goes final. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think only a few more changes are needed to wrap up b20: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The various backports identified in the earlier message in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Backport of 6957375 "java/net/ResponseCache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getResponseCode >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ResponseCacheTest fail after rebranding" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see this come in while I was backporting; had to merge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * One more pass of the Sun -> Oracle copyright script >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are some new Zero bugfixes that could be backported for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would allow us to drop the local copy in IcedTea6). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've CCed Gary Benson who should be able to provide a list of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IDs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for backport. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, we should be good to go with b20. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to drop the copy of Zero in IcedTea sounds >>>>>>>>>>>>>> worthwhile. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> After >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking over the bugids and a webrev, I'd expect to approve >>>>>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going back. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Zero fixes are the last currently planned fixes for b20. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to get b20 wrapped up in the next day or two; please >>>>>>>>>>>>> provide >>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>>>>> of the Zeros bug and I webrev so I can look them over. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for a response from Gary with the bug IDs, but >>>>>>>>>>>> looks >>>>>>>>>>>> like one isn't forthcoming.  I'll compile a list from recent >>>>>>>>>>>> OpenJDK7 >>>>>>>>>>>> build drops and post that shortly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-June/001750.html >>>>>>>>>>>> which causes build breakage with IcedTea. >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Free Java Software Engineer >>>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Support Free Java! >>>>>>>>>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath >>>>>>>>>>>> http://openjdk.java.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) >>>>>>>>>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b87 >>>>>>>>>>> == >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6934089  Zero 32-bit/64kb page fix >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/da06d1795d84 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b90 >>>>>>>>>>> === >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6939180  Zero locking fix >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/747d26efc5fa >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b92 >>>>>>>>>>> === >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6941224: Improved stack overflow handling for Zero >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/f9271ff9d324 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6944503: Improved Zero crash dump >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/c544d979f886 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6944473: 6941224 misses new files >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/aa9c266de52a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These are hs18 Zero fixes.  hs18 also includes 6944028 "6940701 >>>>>>>>> broke >>>>>>>>> Zero," >>>>>>>>> but that fix is not needed in OpenJDK 6 yet since we don't have the >>>>>>>>> fix >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> 6940701 from hs18, as you note below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Approved to go back. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b94 >>>>>>>>>>> === >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6939182: Zero JNI handles fix >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/0c5b3cf3c1f5 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6950178: Zero stack improvements >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/348346af6676 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6950617: Zero/Shark interface updates >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/6cfbdb113e52 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6951784: Zero deoptimizer changes >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/22af4ce8dba1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of these are in hs19 and are approved to go back.  The bug >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6960550 Missing semicolon in Zero >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is "fixed" in hs19, but not yet integrated.  At your option, you >>>>>>>>> may >>>>>>>>> apply >>>>>>>>> this fix to OpenJDK 6 now too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I only looked at integrated fixes.  But this fix looks simple >>>>>>>> enough and as you approve, I've backported it too :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm surprised it even builds without the semi-colon but I guess >>>>>>>> that's >>>>>>>> C++ for you ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b96 >>>>>>>>>>> === >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6951686: Using large pages on Linux prevents zero based >>>>>>>>>>> compressed >>>>>>>>>>> oops >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/79bf863697eb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the webrev for those: >>>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/zero/webrev.05/ and the >>>>>>>>>>> previous >>>>>>>>>>> Nimbus one: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/nimbus/webrev.07/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I approve the -source 6/-target 6 changes for Nimbus; I don't think >>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>> wholesale change to -source 6/-target 6 is necessary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please use 6961536 "Nimbus code using @Override break >>>>>>>>> OpenJDK/IcedBuild >>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>> ecj" for the push. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The following were skipped due to the referenced changesets not >>>>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>>>>>> in OpenJDK6: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6939731: JSR 292 Zero build fix after 6934494 >>>>>>>>>>> 6944028:         6940701 broke Zero >>>>>>>>>>> 6949830: 6939134 broke Zero >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6949423: remove tagged stack interpreter for Zero >>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/68d6683eaef7 >>>>>>>>>>> Depends on: >>>>>>>>>>> changeset:   1426:2338d41fbd81 >>>>>>>>>>> user:        twisti >>>>>>>>>>> date:        Fri Apr 30 08:37:24 2010 -0700 >>>>>>>>>>> summary:     6943304: remove tagged stack interpreter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've checked the bug database and all the Zero fixes in hs18 and >>>>>>>>> hs19 >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> somehow addressed in this email thread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Andrew :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Free Java Software Engineer >>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Support Free Java! >>>>>>>>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath >>>>>>>>>>> http://openjdk.java.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) >>>>>>>>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scratch 6951686; the mention of 'zero' mislead me.  It's not a >>>>>>>>>> Zero >>>>>>>>>> fix. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know when I can push the rest, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to push! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All pushed! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the pushes! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the integration of 6961870 "More rebranding fixes for >>>>>>> templates/gpl-*-header files," which I just pushed, I believe that is >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> last change for b20.  I will tag the repos accordingly pending >>>>>>> successful >>>>>>> results from a round of sanity building and testing. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want to drag b20 out any longer either, but I think it's >>>>>> probably worth doing a final sync of HotSpot to hs17b16, which was >>>>>> just announced: >>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-June/001781.html >>>>>>>>>>>> If you recall, we brought in 6955813: Fix incorrect Oracle rebranding >>>>>> headers from 6941466 already so we now have hs17b15 + that fix.  I >>>>>> think it would be better to have OpenJDK6 builds use a known HotSpot >>>>>> tag, which syncing with hs17b16 would give us.  It actually only means >>>>>> bringing in one more real fix: 6953058: G1: A bigapp crashes with >>>>>> SIGSEGV in compiled code >>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx17/master/rev/d53d91cb378c which >>>>>> sounds important. >>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I suppose we can have one more sync with HotSpot for b20; >>>>> you're >>>>> approved to sync hs17b15 into OpenJDK 6. >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> -Joe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! Done. >>>> -- >>>> Andrew :-) >>>>>>>> Free Java Software Engineer >>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) >>>>>>>> Support Free Java! >>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK >>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath >>>> http://openjdk.java.net >>>>>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) >>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Impressively quick reply btw -- didn't you get this about 1am over there? >>>>> I keep late hours sometimes :-)  (I was actually waiting for a test run on > the repo without the fix to complete.) >>>> -- >>> Andrew :-) >>>>>> Free Java Software Engineer >>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) >>>>>> Support Free Java! >>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK >>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath >>> http://openjdk.java.net >>>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) >>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 >>>>>>>>>> In comparing Zero in OpenJDK6 against the version in IcedTea, I found >> that a couple of Sun Microsystems copyrights have sneaked back in: >>>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stackzero.cpp: * Copyright 2003-2007 Sun >> Microsystems, Inc.  All Rights Reserved. >> src/cpu/zero/vm/stackzero.cpp: * Please contact Sun Microsystems, >> Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara, >> src/cpu/zero/vm/stackzero.inline.hpp: * Copyright 2003-2007 Sun >> Microsystems, Inc.  All Rights Reserved. >> src/cpu/zero/vm/stackzero.inline.hpp: * Please contact Sun >> Microsystems, Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara, >>>> Thanks for the heads up; I'll clean this up before I tag the repo. >> -Joe > Thanks. Sorry for not catching these on their way in.

Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8

More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list