Suggestions for Java Generics Semantics in Java Version 7.0 _ Resurrected (original) (raw)
Dalibor Topic Dalibor.Topic at Sun.COM
Wed Jun 17 16:49:38 PDT 2009
- Previous message: Suggestions for Java Generics Semantics in Java Version 7.0 _ Resurrected
- Next message: Suggestions for Java Generics Semantics in Java Version 7.0 _ Resurrected
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kirill Grouchnikov wrote:
The usage of words "valuable" and "evidently" is very subjective in this context, since i haven't seen any evidence of true community feedback, or any sign of a transparent decision / development process in JDK 7.
I think that it's pretty self-evident that the JDK 7 development process is a lot more transparent then any previous JDK's before. This discussion wouldn't have been possible in the bad old days.
In the interest of a making the development process more transparent, are there any specific things you're working on for OpenJDK 7 yourself, or are you just an interested lurker? Nothing wrong with the latter, but it tends to be easier to understand development one's actively engaged in.
cheers, dalibor topic
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738 Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim Sun Microsystems GmbH Mobile: (+49 177) 2664 192 Nagelsweg 55 http://openjdk.java.net D-20097 Hamburg mailto:Dalibor.Topic at sun.com Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht München: HRB 161028 Geschäftsführer: Thomas Schröder, Wolfgang Engels, Wolf Frenkel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Häring
- Previous message: Suggestions for Java Generics Semantics in Java Version 7.0 _ Resurrected
- Next message: Suggestions for Java Generics Semantics in Java Version 7.0 _ Resurrected
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]