webrevs.2 for macosx changes to jdk7u-osx (original) (raw)

Paul Hohensee paul.hohensee at oracle.com
Thu Dec 1 17:30:30 PST 2011

I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from all the affected teams. I think core libs is the only one we missed, though.

Paul

On 12/1/11 8:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:

On 2/12/2011 7:38 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:

On 12/1/11 6:12 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:

Kelly,

Yes, that is correct. This push is initially just for jdk7u-osx, which is a development forest. I'm not sure exactly what the procedure will be yet for the push into jdk7u-dev. There is no special procedure for pushing into jdk7u-osx that's different from the one for jdk7u-dev. You need to submit a bulk change request for approval first, someone (i.e. either me or Edvard) needs to approve it, then the push can happen - regardless whether that's jdk7u-dev or jdk7u-osx. All the osx porting work is being discussed on the macosx-port-dev mailing list. Most core-libs subscribers will not be on that list (including me - which means my cc to that list will either bounce or get held up). There are proposed changes to core Java classes that should be explicitly reviewed and approved by the core-libs folk in my opinion. David

More information about the jdk7u-dev mailing list