Request for approval for 7154030 (original) (raw)
Request for approval for 7154030 - java.awt.Component.hide() does not repaint parent component
Neil Richards neil.richards at ngmr.net
Tue Aug 7 07:21:45 PDT 2012
- Previous message: Request for approval for 7154030 - java.awt.Component.hide() does not repaint parent component
- Next message: Request for approval for 7154030 - java.awt.Component.hide() does not repaint parent component
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Sean, Just to clarify ...
I believe you've authorized two changesets, for 7154030 and 7168144, to be uploaded to jdk7u-dev in a single push operation.
(As opposed to pushing one changeset containing the changes for both bug ids).
Please confirm whether this interpretation is correct.
Thanks, Neil
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:21 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote:
Thanks for following up Jonathan -
Approved for 7u-dev. I'll update 7154030 and 7168144 records for 7u when I see the push. regards, Sean. On 06/08/2012 03:13, Jonathan Lu wrote: > Hello Sean, > > Here's the webrev of the patch including both fixes for 7154030 and > 7168144, > requesting approval again for porting to 7u. > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/71540307168144jdk7u/ > > Bugs: > http://bugs.sun.com/viewbug.do?bugid=7154030 > http://bugs.sun.com/viewbug.do?bugid=7168144 > > The fix has been review here, > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-March/002362.html > > > Thanks > Jonathan > > On 08/03/2012 11:54 PM, Seán Coffey wrote: >> Thanks for confirming Pavel - >> >> Sounds like you're ok with changes going into 7u as long as 7168144 >> is there also. >> >> Jonathan - please submit fixes/approval requests for both 7154030 and >> 7168144 together when porting this to 7u. >> You can probably run a hg export/import from jdk8 -> 7u for both bug >> fixes and push once with both changesets. >> >> regards, >> Sean. >> >> On 03/08/2012 15:46, Pavel Porvatov wrote: >>> Hi Jonathan, >>>> Jonathan, >>>> >>>> A bug fix can introduce behavioural changes which should not be >>>> allowed in update releases. >>>> >>>> In fact, I've just noticed that this fix caused issue in JCK >>>> verification for JDK 8. >>>> See http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/viewbug.do?bugid=7168144 >>>> which is linked to 7154030 >>> Seán absolutely right. You should take into account fix of CR >>> 7168144 while backportinng. Both CR should be backported together in >>> one fix, I believe. >>> >>> Regards, Pavel >>>> >>>> I think you may either have to get a swing engineer to review for >>>> this port to 7u or start a specific thread for it on swing-dev. >>>> If swing reviewers do approve this for backporting, then 7168144 >>>> changeset will also need porting (simple tag fix for JCK test issue) >>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-May/002793.html >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Sean. >>>> >>>> On 02/08/2012 08:41, Jonathan Lu wrote: >>>>> Hello Sean, >>>>> >>>>> From my point of view, this backport only introduces a fix for a >>>>> existing bug 7154030. >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> Jonathan >>>>> >>>>> On 08/01/2012 12:05 AM, Seán Coffey wrote: >>>>>> Hi Jonathan, >>>>>> >>>>>> does this backport introduce any behavioural changes that could >>>>>> cause issue for an update release (as opposed to a feature >>>>>> release/JDK8) ? I'm cc'ing the original reviewer here to confirm >>>>>> this is ok for an update release just to be sure. Pavel, any >>>>>> issues with this going into 7u ? Granted, this is all around a >>>>>> deprecated API so hopefully many applications aren't using it >>>>>> anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> Sean. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 30/07/2012 23:31, Jonathan Lu wrote: >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm requesting an approval to backport the fix for bug 7154030 >>>>>>> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/viewbug.do?bugid=7154030 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Change set from jdk8, >>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/340cda7e1430 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the same patch is applicable for jdk7u8. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The fix has been review here, >>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-March/002362.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >
-- Unless stated above: IBM email: neil_richards at uk.ibm.com IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
- Previous message: Request for approval for 7154030 - java.awt.Component.hide() does not repaint parent component
- Next message: Request for approval for 7154030 - java.awt.Component.hide() does not repaint parent component
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]