{mailer issue} Fwd: Re: Request for approval: 7190219 (bf) CharBuffer.put(String, int, int) modifies position even if BufferOverflowException thrown (original) (raw)

Seán Coffey sean.coffey at oracle.com
Wed Sep 5 01:21:10 PDT 2012

that's interesting. I see Alan and myself cc'ed on the mail that Tim sent (headers below) It's like the mailer tweaks the mail per recipient then. Still strange!

regards, Sean.

-------- Original Message -------- Received: from [10.132.188.27] (/10.132.188.27) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:24:12 -0700 Message-ID: <50463932.1030803 at oracle.com> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:24:02 -0700 From: Tim Bell <tim.bell at oracle.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jdk7u-dev at openjdk.java.net CC: Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com>, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> Subject: Re: {mailer issue} Fwd: Re: Request for approval: 7190219 (bf) CharBuffer.put(String, int, int) modifies position even if BufferOverflowException thrown References: <5045FA2D.5050801 at oracle.com> <5045FC16.2040007 at oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <5045FC16.2040007 at oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 05/09/2012 02:14, David Holmes wrote:

The email Tim sent in which he states he cc'd people, does not show any cc's. I have noticed this myself when posting to multiple lists and also cc'ing people - some the list mails show the cc list and others do not. So I assume this is a property of each list? David

regards, Sean.

On 04/09/2012 18:24, Tim Bell wrote: Hi Seán:

On a totally unrelated note...

I cc'ed Alan in the below email but the openJDK mailer seems to strip out cc recipients if they're on the openJDK alias. (from what I can make out) - This doesn't help folks who might have filters set up for "to or cc:" fields. any ideas on whether this can be changed ? I'm not sure if it was always happening. I've only seen it occur in past ~1-2 months. In Mailman terminology, this is called "nodupes -- Does the member want to avoid duplicates of the same message?" This setting is controlled by each user for each list they join. Taking the jdk7u-dev list as an example, both you and Alan have ticked the box for 'nodupes' which means you should only get one copy of my reply here, even though I explicitly added you as CC: addressees. If a list user wants to see all email, they should double check their settings for the 'not metoo' and 'nodupes' options in their mailman configuration.

For more information, check the GNU Mailman - List Member Manual: http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/mailman-member.html Regards- Tim

regards, Sean. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Request for approval: 7190219 (bf) CharBuffer.put(String, int, int) modifies position even if BufferOverflowException thrown Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:55:09 +0100 From: Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com> To: Neil Richards <neil.richards at ngmr.net> CC: jdk7u-dev at openjdk.java.net

Hey Neil, I wouldn't regard this as a risky fix and don't see a problem with it going into jdk7u-dev now (before phase2 approval process begins in mid September) It also benefits from having a unit testcase. Testing (jtreg tests) in the jdk8/tl repos would have occurred on a regular basis also since the fix was push there. Alan was initial reviewer and may wish to comment (cc'ed) regards, Sean. On 04/09/2012 13:30, Neil Richards wrote: On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:58 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote: Approved for jdk7u-dev. (7u10) I've created a bug record for this and will mark as fixed once I see your push. cc'ing initial reviewer also. regards, Sean. On 03/09/2012 05:18, Jonathan Lu wrote: Hi folks, Here's a request of porting the fix of 7190219 back to JDK7, could you please review it? Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/viewbug.do?bugid=7190219 Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/bf0c6f91bc22 Thread where it was reviewed: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-August/011087.html

Thanks, Jonathan Hi Sean, It looks like this changeset has not yet been promoted from the component (tl) forest to the master jdk8 repository. Please confirm, in light of this, if you'd like this change to be applied to jdk7u at this point, or if you would like it to spend some (more) time being proved in the jdk8 stream prior to this happening. Regards, Neil

More information about the jdk7u-dev mailing list