[7u10] Request for approval: 7114558: Inet4AddressImpl should use memset (rather than bzero) and NI_MAXHOST (rather than MAXHOSTNAMELEN) (original) (raw)
Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Tue Sep 18 13:42:48 PDT 2012
- Previous message: [7u10] Request for approval: 7114558: Inet4AddressImpl should use memset (rather than bzero) and NI_MAXHOST (rather than MAXHOSTNAMELEN)
- Next message: [7u10] Request for approval: 7114558: Inet4AddressImpl should use memset (rather than bzero) and NI_MAXHOST (rather than MAXHOSTNAMELEN)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sean - this one is relative to 7112670 which is one of the changes that we have concerns about.
-Alan.
On 18/09/2012 19:09, Seán Coffey wrote:
Approved for jdk7u-dev. Note that this most likely means the fix will end up in 7u12. If there's a strong justification for 7u10 inclusion, let me know and one of the jdk7u maintainers can help you work through a phase2 request[1] for 7u10.
I'll create a bug record to track this fix in jdk7u. Regards, Sean. [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/phase2/phase2-process.html On 17/09/2012 09:22, Shi Jun Zhang wrote: Hi all,
I'd like to request for approval to push the following change into 7u10. Changeset in jdk8 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/ee2fa62fb09f Webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhangshj/jdk7u/7114558/webrev.00/ Reviewed by chegar Review thread http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2011-November/003778.html This patch is based on its previous patch I posted just now. http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-September/004449.html
- Previous message: [7u10] Request for approval: 7114558: Inet4AddressImpl should use memset (rather than bzero) and NI_MAXHOST (rather than MAXHOSTNAMELEN)
- Next message: [7u10] Request for approval: 7114558: Inet4AddressImpl should use memset (rather than bzero) and NI_MAXHOST (rather than MAXHOSTNAMELEN)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]