Should 7u40 b31 be delayed by a day ? (original) (raw)
Seán Coffey sean.coffey at oracle.com
Tue Jun 25 09:58:41 PDT 2013
- Previous message: Should 7u40 b31 be delayed by a day ?
- Next message: hg: jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/hotspot: 16 new changesets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Apologies for noise. Didn't mean to cc jdk7u-dev OpenJDK mailing list on this issue (since it concerns build logistics) -
I'll pay better attention next time!
regards, Sean.
On 25/06/2013 17:08, Lana Steuck wrote:
> it looks like master forest is ok.
I see that hotspot has integrated into 7u40 Master (jdk7u/jdk7u40). Just to double-check, are we sure that all the repos in Master (jdk7u/jdk7u40) are fine (-gate and their read-only repos in sync)? Thanks, - Lana On 06/25/2013 07:45 AM, Seán Coffey wrote: The setup of 7u40 stabilization forest has been met with several issues :
* b30 delayed due to deploy request * Installer sync changes broke b31 (weds night) * Hudson crashed on re-attempting to build31 (thurs night) and now we've got mercurial configuration issues which have blocked 7u40 fix pushes since yesterday. (ops team are working this) Given that, would it be wise to push b31 out by a day ? (assuming mercurial issues are resolved today) This does not affect the hsx, deploy or install teams who work from different team forests since it looks like master forest is ok. regards, Sean.
- Previous message: Should 7u40 b31 be delayed by a day ?
- Next message: hg: jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/hotspot: 16 new changesets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]