[7u-60] backport request: 6571600 JNI use results in UnsatisfiedLinkError looking for libmawt.so (original) (raw)
Seán Coffey sean.coffey at oracle.com
Wed Jan 8 00:52:00 PST 2014
- Previous message: [7u-60] backport request: 6571600 JNI use results in UnsatisfiedLinkError looking for libmawt.so
- Next message: hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk: 6571600: JNI use results in UnsatisfiedLinkError looking for libmawt.so
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks for following up Buck. Approved for jdk7u-dev.
Regards, Sean.
On 8 Jan 2014 00:30, david buck <david.buck at oracle.com> wrote:
Hi! I am sorry about not following the correct procedure. The bug has now been tagged 7u60-critical-approved by the release team. Between that and the 2 7u60-specific code reviews, I believe I have met the conditions for phase 2 approval. May I please push this fix into 7u60? Cheers, -Buck (2014/01/07 23:34), Seán Coffey wrote: > Hey Buck, > > Such fixes should be pushed to the jdk7u-dev forest first [1]. It gives > everyone an option to test the fix via the early access bundles. I'd > suggest that steps should be taken to get this fix into jdk7u-dev also. > It looks like you've already marked the bug with 7u60-critical-request. > > Thanks, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/criticalcpufixes.html > > On 07/01/14 01:24, david buck wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Please disregard this request. Due to the urgency of this change, it >> has been approved for inclusion into the April CPU update. It will be >> merged into 7u-dev at the same time the security fixes are. >> >> Best Regards, >> -Buck >> >> (2013/12/25 21:29), david buck wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Sergey Bylokhov and Artem Ananiev have reviewed this fix for 7u60 and >>> have approved. Now all we need is the RM team to approve >>> (7u60-critical-approved tag added in JBS). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -Buck >>> >>> (2013/12/25 5:11), david buck wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I am resending this as a phase 2 request for inclusion into 7u60. >>>> >>>> This is a critical issue impacting multiple users and is an extremely >>>> low-risk change. I have tested jdk7 builds with this fix against our >>>> reproducer and all of the standard (default jprt) tests indicate no >>>> issues. This change has already passed review for inclusion into 5 / 6 >>>> / 9. >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> -Buck >>>> >>>> (2013/12/24 6:02), david buck wrote: >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> This is a request to backport the flowing fix to JDK7. >>>>> >>>>> [ JDK-6571600 JNI use results in UnsatisfiedLinkError looking for >>>>> libmawt.so ] >>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-657160 >>>>> >>>>> The root cause of this issue is a name conflict with JNIOnLoad >>>>> provided >>>>> by awtLoadLibrary.c and code loaded manually by the user (usually >>>>> their >>>>> own JNI libraries). The fix is to use a different name for calling >>>>> dladdr that is much less likely to conflict with any names used by >>>>> customer code. >>>>> >>>>> The fix is exactly the same in JDK7 as it is in both JDK8 and JDK9. I >>>>> have of course tested the fix on JDK7 as well. The JDK9 fix can be >>>>> found >>>>> here: >>>>> >>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/35dfaa9954c2 >>>>> >>>>> As the forest for JDK8u-dev is not up yet, I am submitting individual >>>>> requests to backport to both JDK8 and JDK7 in parallel. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> -Buck >
- Previous message: [7u-60] backport request: 6571600 JNI use results in UnsatisfiedLinkError looking for libmawt.so
- Next message: hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk: 6571600: JNI use results in UnsatisfiedLinkError looking for libmawt.so
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]