Warnings Cleanup in java.util. (original) (raw)

Stuart Marks stuart.marks at oracle.com
Thu Dec 1 19:40:11 PST 2011

Hi Mike,

Thanks for pulling together the London JUG on short notice to bring up folks on building OpenJDK to the point of being able to generate patches! That's a great accomplishment.

Sorry for the trouble with the attachments. As you notice, most everything except text attachments is stripped (though I believe some of the OpenJDK lists will pass zip attachments).

I've filed bug 7117249 to track these changes. David Holmes mentioned that he thought the change in LogManager from Enumeration to Iterator might be out of scope for warnings cleanup. He might be right. I saw some questions from Martijn about other aspects of this code as well. I'll bring in somebody who's more familiar with the logging area to look this over, and then we'll figure out what to do.

Thanks again.

s'marks

On 12/1/11 4:11 PM, Michael Barker wrote:

Trying once more with a .txt extension. If that fails I'll inline the patch.

Mike. On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Michael Barker<mikeb01 at gmail.com> wrote: Looks like the list software has stripped off the attachments from my previous mail (my outbox shows them attached).

Here's a second attempt. On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Michael Barker<mikeb01 at gmail.com> wrote: Hi,

Here is the output of our (unfortunately short) hack session. There are warnings fixed in 4 files. A patch is included in each. Mostly just generics and deprecation warnings. Regards, Michael Barker. Contributor/UserId: mikeb2701

More information about the jdk8-dev mailing list