Proposal to revise forest graph and integration practices for JDK 9 (original) (raw)
Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Fri Dec 6 01:45:21 PST 2013
- Previous message: Proposal to revise forest graph and integration practices for JDK 9
- Next message: Proposal to revise forest graph and integration practices for JDK 9
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03/12/2013 12:47, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
:
In fact, I think it may be even easier for SQE, here's a paradox. We hope to have nightly builds established, and thus be prepared for PIT very well; weekly routine is easier to plan in advance (and SQE is all about planning); finally, we don't really do full-profile manual testing for PIT. It's all automated + some sanity checks + cursory verification of actual fixes. This last task will be smaller if do it weekly. I'm curious about the automated part. For the tests in the jdk repository then is it all of tests in the jdk_desktop group (see TEST.groups) or a subset of them?
-Alan
- Previous message: Proposal to revise forest graph and integration practices for JDK 9
- Next message: Proposal to revise forest graph and integration practices for JDK 9
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]