Initial forests for JDK 9 (original) (raw)

Daniel D. Daugherty daniel.daugherty at oracle.com
Thu Dec 12 13:17:32 PST 2013

On 12/12/13 2:07 PM, Iris Clark wrote:

jdk9-hs-emb-changes: hotspot-runtime-dev There should be an Embedded team alias in addition to hotspot-runtime-dev for this one.Yes, Runtime wants to know about the Embedded team's work, but I think the Embedded team would also like to know... :-) Sounds reasonable. Which openjdk mailing list do they use: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo

Oh.... Good question... Adding Gary Collins to this thread...

Dan

Thanks, iris -----Original Message----- From: Daniel D. Daugherty Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 12:57 PM To: Iris Clark Cc: Mark Reinhold; Stuart Marks; jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Initial forests for JDK 9 On 12/12/13 1:20 PM, Iris Clark wrote: Hi, Mark.

Speaking of replies, should notifications set a reply-to header directing replies to a discussion list? Having discussion on a dedicated notification list would seem like a problem. (This applies to all the per-forest notification lists, not just master.) Iris -- What's your plan for the Reply-To headers of changeset notifications? Based on where the notifications for jdk8 go, these are the default "Reply-to" values for each of the new mailing lists: jdk9-changes: jdk9-dev jdk9-dev-changes: compiler-dev, core-libs-dev, serviceability-dev, net-dev, build-dev jdk9-client-changes: 2d-dev, awt-dev, swing-dev jdk9-hs-changes: hotspot-dev jdk9-hs-comp-changes: hotspot-compiler-dev jdk9-hs-emb-changes: hotspot-runtime-dev There should be an Embedded team alias in addition to hotspot-runtime-dev for this one.Yes, Runtime wants to know about the Embedded team's work, but I think the Embedded team would also like to know... :-) Dan jdk9-hs-gc-changes: hotspot-gc-dev jdk9-hs-rt-changes: hotspot-runtime-dev, serviceability-dev Does everything look right? Thanks, iris

More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list