JDK 9 forests open (original) (raw)
Joe Darcy joe.darcy at oracle.com
Wed Dec 18 11:41:50 PST 2013
- Previous message: JDK 9 forests open
- Next message: Updated jtreg build in the works ahead of JDK_MINOR_VERSION increment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/18/2013 08:36 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 13/12/2013 22:27, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
The JDK 9 forests are open, per my previous message [1], except that "hotspot" is replaced by "hs" in the names of the HotSpot forests.
Just to double check one thing (and this ties into the thread on jdk8-dev on Managing parallel change). The jdk9 forests seem to be created from jdk8-b120. If I read the mails correctly then this means that anything pushed to a jdk8 integration forest that didn't make b120 needs to be pushed to one of the jdk9 integration forests, right? I just want to check because I see several changes in jdk8/tl that are not in jdk9/dev (not yet anyway).
Correct.
-Joe
- Previous message: JDK 9 forests open
- Next message: Updated jtreg build in the works ahead of JDK_MINOR_VERSION increment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]