Combiner -> BiFunction? (original) (raw)
Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Mon Dec 10 08:23:03 PST 2012
- Previous message: Combiner -> BiFunction?
- Next message: Forms for reduce() -- part 1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/10/2012 05:03 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
Are we OK with just merging Combiner into BiFunction? Both are the same signature: (T,U) -> V.
Ordinarily I don't mind having specialized names if the name carries extra meaning, but I'm not sure this one does.
Yes, and I still think that UnrayOperator should be Operator and BinaryOperator should be BiOperator for consistency.
Rémi
- Previous message: Combiner -> BiFunction?
- Next message: Forms for reduce() -- part 1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-experts mailing list