Combiner -> BiFunction? (original) (raw)

Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Mon Dec 10 08:23:03 PST 2012


On 12/10/2012 05:03 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:

Are we OK with just merging Combiner into BiFunction? Both are the same signature: (T,U) -> V.

Ordinarily I don't mind having specialized names if the name carries extra meaning, but I'm not sure this one does.

Yes, and I still think that UnrayOperator should be Operator and BinaryOperator should be BiOperator for consistency.

Rémi



More information about the lambda-libs-spec-experts mailing list