Foo.Of{Int,Long,Double} naming convention (original) (raw)

Tim Peierls tim at peierls.net
Sun Dec 23 09:54:03 PST 2012

• Previous message: Foo.Of{Int,Long,Double} naming convention
• Next message: Foo.Of{Int,Long,Double} naming convention
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com>wrote:

[E.g.:] class Foo implements MutableReducer.OfInt { ... }

Are we OK with this convention?

I'm more than OK with it.

--tim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/attachments/20121223/ba1f43d6/attachment.html

• Previous message: Foo.Of{Int,Long,Double} naming convention
• Next message: Foo.Of{Int,Long,Double} naming convention
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the lambda-libs-spec-experts mailing list