Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces (original) (raw)
Kevin Bourrillion kevinb at google.com
Thu Nov 1 08:46:13 PDT 2012
- Previous message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Next message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I like the name Provider best, but Guava couldn't use it because Guice hogged it, and now the JDK can't use it because javax.inject hogged it. :-)
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
Also I am starting to lean towards "Supplier" instead of "Factory", since factory connotes "make me a new one" and supplier merely connotes "find me one somehow." (This is consistent with Guava's choice.)
On 11/1/2012 7:58 AM, Doug Lea wrote:
My main non-technical reaction is that more I see "Mapper", the more I hate it. It interacts awfully especially with Maps. "Fun" (with lots of precedent in other languages) would be fine. Even "Function" would be fine. -Doug
-- Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com
- Previous message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Next message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list