Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces (original) (raw)
Doug Lea dl at cs.oswego.edu
Fri Nov 2 16:14:56 PDT 2012
- Previous message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Next message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/02/12 18:30, Raab, Donald wrote:
If resistance to Function is lessening, and Predicate is already decided, then why not just go for Procedure for forEach to round out the trio? These are the names we settled on in GS Collections and match the names Doug used in his collections framework many years ago.
Which I didn't spend more than 5 minutes choosing back in 1994/5 because they were the obvious ones (at least since Algol60 :-)
-Doug
- Previous message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Next message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list