Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces (original) (raw)

Tim Peierls tim at peierls.net
Sat Nov 3 14:17:05 PDT 2012

[forgot to reply all]

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:

I think the opposite is better -- let them each have a unique name. Otherwise, we can run into overload problems where we want one Sam to implement or extend another -- which I don't think is dumb.

It's not dumb, it's just that I have yet to encounter a need for it in practice.

Having the same name is much easier on the brain. This stuff is asking a lot of people already; here's one way to reduce the pain.

--tim

More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list