Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces (original) (raw)
Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Sun Nov 4 06:13:41 PST 2012
- Previous message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Next message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/04/2012 03:06 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
On 11/03/12 16:04, Brian Goetz wrote:
(Respond only if you hate block.)
As I first implied overly cutely, "block" is a heavily overloaded word. So, while it sounds OK in context, it will confuse people who aren't thinking about the context. The other term with plenty of precedent in Java and elsewhere is "Action". And seems not to have any odd overloadings. I'd be OK with it.
There is already several Action in swing/AWT land, action listener + properties or desktop action.
-Doug
Rémi
- Previous message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Next message: Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list