CompletableFuture (original) (raw)
Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Wed Nov 28 08:09:24 PST 2012
- Previous message: CompletableFuture
- Next message: CompletableFuture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/28/2012 04:07 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
On 11/27/12 17:01, Remi Forax wrote:
/** * Performs the given action with the result of this * CompletableFuture if/when it completes normally. * * @return this CompletableFuture, for convenience */ public CompletableFuture then(Block<? super T> action); The result should be a Completable<?> not a CompletableFuture, right ? The void completion methods don't return new CompletableFuture (no need) but just "return this" to be nice to fluency fans.
aaaaaah, It means that with CompletableFuture c = completableFuture.then(e -> foo(e)); c.isDone() can be true even if foo() has still not finished.
Having a fluent interface is a nice trick but here, the resulting semantics is too weird IMO.
-Doug
Rémi
- Previous message: CompletableFuture
- Next message: CompletableFuture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list