parallelStream() methods (original) (raw)

Kevin Bourrillion kevinb at google.com
Fri Feb 8 15:25:19 PST 2013

• Previous message: stream() / parallelStream() methods
• Next message: stream() / parallelStream() methods
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:

(Tangentially, I would really love to drop parallelStream() and let

people call stream().parallel(). But I haven't managed to scour the archives to find if that argument's already suitably played out.)

Direct version is more performant, in that it requires less wrapping (to turn a stream into a parallel stream, you have to first create the sequential stream, then transfer ownership of its state into a new Stream.)

But really a lot of work has already happened by then?

-- Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com

• Previous message: stream() / parallelStream() methods
• Next message: stream() / parallelStream() methods
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list