FlatMapper (original) (raw)

Kevin Bourrillion kevinb at google.com
Thu Feb 21 08:33:09 PST 2013

Tardy, but: the Googlers I ran this by all felt just fine with "mapInto". Sure, you can map *multiple, *but that fact just didn't seem overly necessary to force into the name.

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com> wrote:

flattenInto gets my vote On Feb 17, 2013 11:09 AM, "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:

On 02/17/2013 08:07 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:

flattenInto seems the best so far.

+1 Rémi On 2/17/2013 9:36 AM, Tim Peierls wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr_ _<mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:

mapAndFlattenInto is a little to verbose for me, mapAndFlat ?

No, has to be a verb. I'd still understand flattenInto, leaving the mapping part to be implied by the type name. --tim

-- Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com

More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list