FlatMapper (original) (raw)

Joe Bowbeer joe.bowbeer at gmail.com
Thu Feb 21 08:42:27 PST 2013

I prefer flattenInto. On Feb 21, 2013 8:36 AM, "Brian Goetz" <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:

Is mapInto better than flattenInto? Still trivial to change at this point.

On 2/21/2013 11:33 AM, Kevin Bourrillion wrote:

Tardy, but: the Googlers I ran this by all felt just fine with "mapInto". Sure, you can map /multiple, /but that fact just didn't seem overly necessary to force into the name.

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com_ _<mailto:joe.bowbeer at gmail.com>**> wrote: flattenInto gets my vote On Feb 17, 2013 11:09 AM, "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr_ _<mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>> wrote: On 02/17/2013 08:07 PM, Brian Goetz wrote: flattenInto seems the best so far.

+1 Rémi On 2/17/2013 9:36 AM, Tim Peierls wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr> <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>>> wrote: mapAndFlattenInto is a little to verbose for me, mapAndFlat ? No, has to be a verb. I'd still understand flattenInto, leaving the mapping part to be implied by the type name. --tim

-- Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. |kevinb at google.com <mailto:kevinb at google.com>

More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list