Yet another run at reduce (original) (raw)
Brian Goetz brian.goetz at oracle.com
Tue Jan 8 10:40:02 PST 2013
- Previous message: Yet another run at reduce
- Next message: Yet another run at reduce (collect)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
And then...
into(collection) becomes reduce(intoList()) reduce(intoSet()) I think, I prefer, reduce(toList()) and reduce(toSet()), because their semantics is slightly different than into.
That's reasonable.
reduce(intoCollection(ArrayList::new))
where intoList() could be as simple as: public static Reducer<T,List> intoList() { return intoCollection(ArrayList::new); } and intoCollection is as shown below. intoCollection should specifies that the supplier can be called several times, so it should always returns a new collection, i.e. this doesn't work:
Right. Needs to be doc'ed.
public static Reducer<T,List> intoList() { ArrayList list = new ArrayList<>(); return intoCollection(() -> list); }
I fear that people will write something like that and only test with a serial stream.
A valid fear :(
- Previous message: Yet another run at reduce
- Next message: Yet another run at reduce (collect)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list