One more pass on flatMap/mapMulti (original) (raw)
Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Thu Jan 10 09:43:04 PST 2013
- Previous message: One more pass on flatMap/mapMulti
- Next message: One more pass on flatMap/mapMulti
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/10/2013 06:28 PM, Tim Peierls wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com_ _<mailto:brian.goetz at oracle.com>> wrote:
Bikeshed discussions can continue.
OK, then! :-) The method name "send" is OK, but you wouldn't be seeing it in the signature of explode. What you would see is Downstream, which still bugs me. The word "downstream" is an adverb or adjective, not a noun. Things are sent downstream, they aren't sent to a downstream. Was Acceptor.accept proposed and rejected already? If so, why? I would understand explode(BiBlock<Acceptor, T>))
wildcard intervention: explode(BiBlock<Acceptor<? super T>, ? super T>))
--tim
Rémi
- Previous message: One more pass on flatMap/mapMulti
- Next message: One more pass on flatMap/mapMulti
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list