concurrent sets (original) (raw)
Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Sat Jan 12 05:40:28 PST 2013
- Previous message: concurrent sets
- Next message: Optional.orElse(null) ambiguity
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/12/2013 02:13 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
I'm still working on lambda-related tie-ins for j.u.c stuff (mostly Spliterators). As mentioned before, we will supply two explicitly concurrent Sets, both via static factory methods: ConcurrentHashMap.newKeySet, and ConcurrentSkipListMap.newKeySet. (The CSLM one gives Sorted/Navigable Set) These are necessary when people need/want parallel collect-into operations for sets. But how will they know to do this?
they don't need if they use methods Collector.to*
the implicit way: stream.parallel(). ... .collect(Collector.toSet()); // use a concurrent hash set stream.parallell(). ... .collect(Collector.toSortedSet()); // use a concurrent skip list set
the explicit way: Set<...> set = ConcurrentHashMap.newKeySet(); stream.parallel(). ... .forEach(set::add); SortedSet<...> sortedSet = ConcurrentSkipListMap.newKeySet(); stream.parallell(). ... .forEach(sortedSet::add);
The explicit way can be written is the javadoc of newKeyset() as an example of use.
-Doug
Rémi
- Previous message: concurrent sets
- Next message: Optional.orElse(null) ambiguity
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list