package access modifier? (original) (raw)
Brian Goetz brian.goetz at oracle.com
Mon Jan 14 10:02:02 PST 2013
- Previous message: package access modifier?
- Next message: package access modifier?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Back at the last EG meeting, we discussed how in theory we would prefer to have a full set of accessibilities for interface methods, and that would require this little bit of syntax. The lack of this little bit of syntax is also a persistent annoyance to some people. However, since it is looking like even private methods may not make the train, this is certainly a dispensible feature for 8, and not doing it now does not foreclose on doing it later.
On Jan 14, 2013, at 12:22 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
On 01/14/2013 09:19 AM, David Holmes wrote:
I admit I haven't been able to keep up lately but I don't recall seeing any discussion of actually adding "package" as an access modifier, yet there it is.
David I have seen that too, and I don't understand why it was introduced, I remember we have discussed to add it to have a way to create package method in interface but since we rule out that. Rémi
- Previous message: package access modifier?
- Next message: package access modifier?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list