Function type naming conventions (original) (raw)
Tim Peierls tim at peierls.net
Wed Jan 23 13:26:12 PST 2013
- Previous message: Function type naming conventions
- Next message: Function type naming conventions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
- Where multiple rules apply, do we prefer XY or XToY?
XToY
- Do we like the "drop the arity prefix in case all are specialized" rule
tweak?
Yes, assuming it doesn't lead to collisions.
(And, orthogonal, I know, but let's not forget the Block renaming issue in all this. Anything, anything is better than Block.)
--tim
- Previous message: Function type naming conventions
- Next message: Function type naming conventions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list