tag boucing again (original) (raw)
Kelly O'Hair kelly.ohair at oracle.com
Tue Jan 17 14:00:41 PST 2012
- Previous message: tag boucing again
- Next message: tag boucing again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Which, in my opinion, is a tag that should not be made external in an openjdk repository. It's very confusing to the openjdk community.
It may be time to allow for an optional lettering scheme, so that you could have a jdk7u4-b05m1 or some such nonsense. Playing around with the build promotion number is not a good plan. :^(
-kto
On Jan 14, 2012, at 10:23 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
That's a tag for an internal build.
Dan
On 1/14/12 2:18 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: It seems we're back to b2xx in tags :
jdk7u4-b225 398:2fea92d741b7 jdk7u4-b05 396:a15712a2304e jdk7u4-b200 392:25457f672756 jdk7u4-b04 391:bcc37b8ac1b0 jdk7u2-b21 389:e30fd289f001 Is it a QA tag or something else ? Cheers
- Previous message: tag boucing again
- Next message: tag boucing again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]