Code Review Request: 7126993: JCK test api/java_util/jar/Jarfile jarFile0129 failing [macosx] (original) (raw)
Kurchi Hazra kurchi.subhra.hazra at oracle.com
Thu Jan 19 12:17:46 PST 2012
- Previous message: Code Review Request: 7126993: JCK test api/java_util/jar/Jarfile jarFile0129 failing [macosx]
- Next message: Code Review Request: 7126993: JCK test api/java_util/jar/Jarfile jarFile0129 failing [macosx]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I see that O_DELETE is 0x10000 in os_bsd.cpp in 7u4osx too. So basically, the only change required for the time being is the one in the webrev below.
This maybe a stupid question, but if O_DELETE is already defined, why do we have to use a separate JVM_O_DELETE macro? Why can't we just use O_DELETE in ZipFile.c?
If the reason is consistency, that is to have all flags used in open() defined at one place in jvm_md.h, then why can't we just use a dummy macro such as O_DEL and define it in jvm_md.h as O_DELETE?
- Kurchi
On 1/19/2012 12:02 PM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
If this change needs to be make, we should make the same change in osbsd.cpp. The original value of ODELETE in osbsd.cpp was 0x10000 and hasn't been changed since.
Paul On 1/19/12 2:18 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 19/01/2012 18:56, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
Hi, JCK tests api/javautil/jar/Jarfile and api/javautil/zip/ZipFile were both failing on Mac because the OPENDELETE flag sets the JVMODELETE flag in native code, and the value of JVMODELETE was changed from 0x10000 to0x10000000 for Mac OS. The JVMODELETE flag is only used in src/share/native/java/util/zip/ZipFile.c and hence this change should be safe.
Bug : http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/viewbug.do?bugid=7126993 Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~khazra/7126993/webrev.00/ At some point we need to change the zip and other code so that it's not using the JVM functions (not needed anymore). I checked osbsd.cpp and ODELETE is defined as 0x10000 so this is the value that JVMODELETE needs to have in jvmmd.d. I don't know why it was changed to 0x10000000 but it must have had a corresponding change in HotSpot at one point. -Alan.
-- -Kurchi
- Previous message: Code Review Request: 7126993: JCK test api/java_util/jar/Jarfile jarFile0129 failing [macosx]
- Next message: Code Review Request: 7126993: JCK test api/java_util/jar/Jarfile jarFile0129 failing [macosx]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]