RFR: JDK-5108778 Too many instances of java.lang.Boolean created in Java application (original) (raw)

Sebastian Sickelmann sebastian.sickelmann at gmx.de
Wed Sep 30 03:38:33 UTC 2015

Yes it is the only (non-test) source i could find in hotspot, but i want to change it in all openjdk sources i can find it. I thought i really must discuss it part by part in the mailing-lists. Actually i am working on the issue to save against regression on this. Thanks Alexandr for this input. So there will be something that integrates into jtreg for this too.

-- Sebastian

On 09/30/2015 01:11 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:

Thanks for volunteering to look into such old bugs!

Is this the only occurrence of that pattern in the hotspot repository? If you want to fix this in hotspot only without the jdk changes described in the RFE (I just changed the type from Bug to Enhancement) then we have to file a new RFE because we can’t close the original one.

On Sep 27, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Sebastian Sickelmann <sebastian.sickelmann at gmx.de> wrote:

Hello, my name is Sebastian Sickelmann and i signed the OCA. Actually I am searching through the JBS for low hanging fruits. Right now i am looking through the openjdk-sources and try to evaluate if i can make something about JDK-5108778. As I am not an author, I am actually not able to host webrevs on cr.openjdk.java.net. Is there someone who would support at hosting the hotspot-part of JDK-5108778 on cr.openjdk.java.net for reviewing? I placed the hotspot part in my dropbox at: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/43692695/oss-patches/openjdk/jdk-5108778/hotspot0/webrev/index.html or as zip: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/43692695/oss-patches/openjdk/jdk-5108778/hotspot0/webrev.zip I executed all jtreg tests in hotspot/test and get no more errors than before the change. -- Sebastian

More information about the macosx-port-dev mailing list