Fwd: Re: Suppress creation of SocksSocketImpl in SocketAdaptor's constructor (original) (raw)
Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Fri Nov 18 03:38:47 PST 2011
- Previous message: Fwd: Re: Suppress creation of SocksSocketImpl in SocketAdaptor's constructor
- Next message: Fwd: Re: Suppress creation of SocksSocketImpl in SocketAdaptor's constructor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 18/11/2011 10:57, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Hi Kris,
I think this change should be fine, but I would like Alan to comment also. I'm not around this week but will look at it next week. One initial comment is that the need to use the socket adapter went away in jdk7. Newer code using SocketChannel can invoke SocketChannel's bind or setOption methods directly.
-Alan
- Previous message: Fwd: Re: Suppress creation of SocksSocketImpl in SocketAdaptor's constructor
- Next message: Fwd: Re: Suppress creation of SocksSocketImpl in SocketAdaptor's constructor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]