Request for refactoring: Config.getXXX() (original) (raw)

Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng valerie.peng at oracle.com
Thu Jul 5 23:03:35 UTC 2012

Yes, I prefer the idea of explicitly specifying the path for finding the values even if more calls are needed. Valerie

On 06/18/12 19:07, Weijun Wang wrote:

This is about the internal class sun.security.krb5.Config.

If you want to get a value from inside krb5.conf, you can call getDefault(String). This might be good to get a value from the [libdefaults] section. However, the method was designed to be so smart that it can recursively search for key/value pairs no matter how deep it is. For example, given a krb5.conf [s1] a=b [s2] c=d [s3] e = { f = g } getDefault("a") = "b", getDefault("c") = "d", and astonishingly, getDefault("f") = "g". I don't think this is a good design, for several reasons: 1. It depends on the order of sections if there are key/value pairs with the same key. 2. It ignores wrong settings. For example, when doing a cross-realm auth, the Realm.getRealmsList(from,to) is used to get a path which should be defined in [capaths]. However, the method simply crawls recursively into any subsection it found and won't notice the [capaths] being mistakenly typed as [capath] 3. It lacks certain features. Because the function always return a String (same with the getDefault(String,String) method), getDefault("e") can only return a null. Therefore there is no way to find out the existence of the subsection e unless we also know it contains a key f. 4. The current Config class needs to know what subsections contains more subsections, and it hardcodes names like [capaths] and [realms]. In short, it's just too smart and becomes unsafe to use. I suggest removing all this smartness and a user must use the full paths to get a value, say, kdc = config.get("realms", "SUN.COM", "kdc") My full spec is: 1. The Config class should understand a krb5.conf without knowing any specific section names. All it maintains is a Value, which can be either of String List TreeMap<String,Value> Here I use TreeMap to preserve the order (might not be necessary). 2. The basic retrieval method will be Value get(String... key) 3. There are simply methods if you already know what the type in your case is String getAsString(String... key) List getAsStringList(String... key) The compatibility risk will be low, and if there really comes a compatibility issue, most likely it will be because the caller had written his krb5.conf wrong. One of the advantages of the original design is that when a key is provided in both [libdefaults] and a given realm, the method can find it anyway. This will be useful for keys like kdctimeout, maxretries. However, I think this automatic retrieval is confusing and error-prone, I'd rather manually call the get() method twice. Thanks Max

More information about the security-dev mailing list