Code Review Request for 7107613, 7107616, 7185471 (original) (raw)
Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng valerie.peng at oracle.com
Thu Jul 26 23:26:41 UTC 2012
- Previous message (by thread): Code Review Request for 7107613, 7107616, 7185471
- Next message (by thread): Code Review Request for 7107613, 7107616, 7185471
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max,
So, do you want me to check the exemptCache again, i.e. what line 122- 125 do, inside the synchronized block before calling getAppPermissions(...)?
Thanks, Valerie
On 07/25/12 18:29, Weijun Wang wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/7107616 You have 122 CryptoPermissions appPerms = exemptCache.get(callerCodeBase); 123 // Found result in cache 124 if (appPerms != null) { 125 if (appPerms == CACHENULLMARK) appPerms = null; 126 } else { 127 synchronized (this.getClass()) { 128 appPerms = getAppPermissions(callerCodeBase); 129 exemptCache.putIfAbsent(callerCodeBase, 130 (appPerms == null? CACHENULLMARK:appPerms)); 131 } 132 } This is not as optimized as before, that there is a chance getAppPermissions could be called twice, and this seems to make the synchronized block not worth syncing.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/7185471 I haven't looked at this yet. Seems a lot of math there. Thanks Max
The changes are for JDK 8. May be backported to 7u later if necessary, Thanks, Valerie
- Previous message (by thread): Code Review Request for 7107613, 7107616, 7185471
- Next message (by thread): Code Review Request for 7107613, 7107616, 7185471
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]