[PATCH FOR REVIEW] Allow OpenJDK to be built with the unlimited crypto policy (original) (raw)
Andrew Hughes gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Fri Sep 28 04:09:31 UTC 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH FOR REVIEW] Allow OpenJDK to be built with the unlimited crypto policy
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH FOR REVIEW] Allow OpenJDK to be built with the unlimited crypto policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message -----
It's now marked as resolved.
Thanks, Brad
Great. Thanks! Glad to get this finally resolved.
I'll let it promote through to 8, then suggest it for 7u.
On 9/27/2012 9:58 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>>>> Will you be putting this back yourself? If so let me know when >>>>> you >>>>> go >>>>> in, and I can update the bug once you're in. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I will, though I'll need a bug ID for it. I presume tl is ok as >>>> the >>>> forest to use? >>> >>> This going into 8? Then yes. >>> >> >> At first, yes. Do you have any objections to me proposing it for >> 7u >> too, in due course? >> >>> 7201205: Add Makefile configuration option to build with >>> unlimited >>> crypto in OpenJDK. >>> >> >> Great, thanks! I'll push it. >> > > All done: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/9e879c0288c2 > >>> Brad >>> >>> >>> >>>>> Mark wrote: >>>>> > The summary is that it was just easier to remove unused >>>>> > classes >>>>> > that >>>>> > made the code tricky to understand for no good reason >>>>> > except >>>>> > for >>>>> > some >>>>> > secret proprietary code. >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, Oracle and some of our commercial (non-OpenJDK) >>>>> licensees >>>>> still depend on that tricky code. :( I'd personally love to >>>>> strip >>>>> it >>>>> all out, but we have to balance all of its consumers (Oracle SE >>>>> and >>>>> ME, >>>>> commercial source/binary licensees, OpenJDK, etc.) >>>>> >>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>> > I'm sure it would be easy enough to dump those classes if >>>>> > Oracle >>>>> > started producing OpenJDK binaries licensed under the GPL, >>>>> > rather >>>>> > than binaries from their proprietary fork. >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, not likely in our current export/import climate. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, this is what I thought. We just have to make sure to test >>>> well >>>> before shipping binaries. >>>> >>>>> Brad >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Andrew :) >> >> Free Java Software Engineer >> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) >> >> PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) >> Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 >> >> >
-- Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH FOR REVIEW] Allow OpenJDK to be built with the unlimited crypto policy
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH FOR REVIEW] Allow OpenJDK to be built with the unlimited crypto policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]