Code review request: 8006564: Test sun/security/util/Oid/S11N.sh fails with timeout on Linux 32-bit (original) (raw)
Weijun Wang weijun.wang at oracle.com
Mon Jan 28 09:03:17 UTC 2013
- Previous message (by thread): Code review request: 8006564: Test sun/security/util/Oid/S11N.sh fails with timeout on Linux 32-bit
- Next message (by thread): Code review request: 8006564: Test sun/security/util/Oid/S11N.sh fails with timeout on Linux 32-bit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Your opinion? I still like to keep my changes.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8006564/webrev.00/
-Max
On 01/21/2013 10:25 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Oh, did I mention jdk8 and jdk7 are using the same format?
In fact, I don't think it's "too tied to impl", you can see that my fake jdk6-style class is quite clean itself so it's just a reimpl of the jdk6 serialization interface. I was more concerned about using the -Xbootclasspath option, which many people (including you) had said will be unusable after module. -Max On 01/21/2013 10:21 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 21/01/2013 14:19, Wang Weijun wrote:
I've thought about that, but it means there is no way to check forward-compatibility. (Am I using the correct word? Deserialize jdk7 format with jdk6).
Max Right, but this is a test in the jdk8 forest and so it should only be testing jdk8. -Alan
- Previous message (by thread): Code review request: 8006564: Test sun/security/util/Oid/S11N.sh fails with timeout on Linux 32-bit
- Next message (by thread): Code review request: 8006564: Test sun/security/util/Oid/S11N.sh fails with timeout on Linux 32-bit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]