Do we need an unsigned multiplyHigh? (original) (raw)
Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Tue Sep 26 14:25:02 UTC 2017
- Previous message (by thread): Do we need an unsigned multiplyHigh?
- Next message (by thread): Do we need an unsigned multiplyHigh?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 26/09/17 11:20, Peter Lawrey wrote:
We have arrays already but we don't have primitive types of more than 64-bit. If we had uint128 for example we wouldn't need this method.
Perhaps not, but why is needing this method a problem?
-- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
- Previous message (by thread): Do we need an unsigned multiplyHigh?
- Next message (by thread): Do we need an unsigned multiplyHigh?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]