Do we need an unsigned multiplyHigh? (original) (raw)

John Rose john.r.rose at oracle.com
Wed Sep 27 18:45:24 UTC 2017

On Sep 27, 2017, at 8:25 AM, Peter Lawrey <peter.lawrey at gmail.com> wrote:

Perhaps project Valhalla will be a way to return multiple values by having a composite value type, or panama with it's support for XMM instructions (or both)

That seems likely; we are aiming in both of those directions, to support direct programming with AVX-type registers (not just x86 specific, by the way) and general support for by-value return of structured objects (starting with "minimal value types").

For now, though, every method is limited to at most 64 bits of return value "payload", which means that 128-bit operations need to be split into two method calls, or else buffer their result into a temp object (e.g., array). The JIT knows how to combine two intrinsic calls into a single machine operation, in some very limited circumstances, notably the classic "div/rem" instructions. This technique would probably work for 64-to-128 multiplies. (Also AES-128, by the way.)

— John -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20170927/17dc945c/attachment.htm>

More information about the security-dev mailing list