RFR(S): 8195109: ServiceUtil::visible_oop is not needed anymore (original) (raw)
Chris Plummer chris.plummer at oracle.com
Tue Mar 20 19:39:47 UTC 2018
- Previous message: RFR(S): 8195109: ServiceUtil::visible_oop is not needed anymore
- Next message: RFR(S): 8195109: ServiceUtil::visible_oop is not needed anymore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8195109/webrev.01/index.html
There was a build failure on solaris-sparc in threadSMR.cpp. References to the Copy class were producing "unresolved symbol" errors. threadSMR.cpp includes threadService.hpp, which no longer includes serviceUtil.hpp (because it was removed). It looks like serviceUtil.hpp indirectly included "utilities/copy.hpp", so now I include it directly in threadSMR.cpp. The problem was only on solaris-sparc, so I assume on other platforms there was platform dependent code indirectly pulling in copy.hpp. In any case, it's now directly pulled in on all platforms.
thanks,
Chris
On 3/19/18 5:48 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hello,
Please review the following: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195109 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8195109/webrev.00/index.html The assert I added to make sure this is safe has been in place in jdk/jdk for almost 3 weeks with no issues (longer in jdk/hs). The webrev is missing the copyright update for threadService.hpp. I fixed it after noticing that. Testing is in progress. Running hs tiers 1, 2, and 3, and jdk tiers 1 and 2. Also making sure all serviceability tests are run. thanks, Chris
- Previous message: RFR(S): 8195109: ServiceUtil::visible_oop is not needed anymore
- Next message: RFR(S): 8195109: ServiceUtil::visible_oop is not needed anymore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]