Question about improvement on reified generics (original) (raw)
Marcus Manning iconsize at gmail.com
Tue Feb 13 08🔞09 UTC 2018
- Previous message (by thread): hg: valhalla/valhalla: 134 new changesets
- Next message (by thread): hg: valhalla/valhalla: 3 new changesets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dear Valhalla Team,
Thanks for the great work with regard to value types and value type generics. Because of the good state documentation, I understand the things more clearly.
When you expect to release these two features? Java 10, 11 or 12?
2017-10-30 23:46 GMT+01:00 Vijay Lakshminarayanan <laksvij at hawk.iit.edu>:
Thanks Marcus.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Marcus Manning <iconsize at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: Question about improvement on reified generics > Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:34:50 +0100 > From: Marcus Manning <iconsize at gmail.com> > To: Vijay Lakshminarayanan <laksvij at hawk.iit.edu> > > > > Sorry, forgot it: > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/jvmls2016-goetz-3126134.pdf > > 2017-10-29 23:27 GMT+01:00 Vijay Lakshminarayanan <laksvij at hawk.iit.edu_ _> <mailto:laksvij at hawk.iit.edu>>: > > Can you include the link to [1]? > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Marcus Manning <iconsize at gmail.com_ _> <mailto:iconsize at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello Valhalla-Dev, > > > > I have a question to the the improvement of reified generics in > java. I read > > about it by [1] > > If I understand it correctly, class will be reified, > but not > > class, right? But then, on page 31 of [1] > something like a > > reified String is captured and String is a reference type? After > all, will > > class become a reified type? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Marcus > > > >
- Previous message (by thread): hg: valhalla/valhalla: 134 new changesets
- Next message (by thread): hg: valhalla/valhalla: 3 new changesets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]