RFR:JDK-8198749 Translation of value constructors in classic constructor notation (original) (raw)
Brian Goetz brian.goetz at oracle.com
Thu Jul 12 01:08:08 UTC 2018
- Previous message (by thread): RFR:JDK-8198749 Translation of value constructors in classic constructor notation
- Next message (by thread): RFR:JDK-8198749 Translation of value constructors in classic constructor notation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think we will end up with some user-level syntax for referring to a VT's default value by name. Something like
VT.default. It would compile directly to a defaultvalue instruction. Perhaps via a tree that strongly resembles a global constant reference in VT. Hmm, nice how all that hangs together…
T.default is what we used in Model 3.
- Previous message (by thread): RFR:JDK-8198749 Translation of value constructors in classic constructor notation
- Next message (by thread): RFR:JDK-8198749 Translation of value constructors in classic constructor notation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]