[Python-3000] int-long unification (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Sat Aug 19 21:06:02 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-3000] int-long unification
- Next message: [Python-3000] int-long unification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 8/19/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
Martin, I've thought about it more, and I think it's fine to use a single type. It will surely simplify many things, and that alone might help us win back some of the inefficiency this introduces. And it is best for Python-level users.
Woohoo! I totally support this idea (along with anything else that comes up to simplify the C API; I almost feel like we need a dumbed-down API along with the full-powered API behind it). I also support Martin doing the work =) (but that's mostly because I know he is in a good position to do it well).
-Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/attachments/20060819/c6bd844a/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Python-3000] int-long unification
- Next message: [Python-3000] int-long unification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]