[Python-3000] Empty set and empty dictionary (original) (raw)
Eoghan Murray eoghan at qatano.com
Tue Apr 17 02:31:56 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Empty set and empty dictionary
- Next message: [Python-3000] Empty set and empty dictionary
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I had another idea on this theme.. going by unicode and raw string literals, how about s[1, 2, 3, 4] for a set?
Eoghan
On 17/04/07, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
DillonCo wrote: > Why not use "<>" for sets? Some possible reasons: * It would look ugly * There could be visual confusion with comparison operators * There could be parsing difficulties distinguishing nested set bracketing from << and >> operators -- Greg
Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000 at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/eoghan%40qatano.com
-- http://qatano.com/ http://eoghan.qatano.org/ +353 86 236 1190 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/attachments/20070417/472d19b9/attachment-0001.html
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Empty set and empty dictionary
- Next message: [Python-3000] Empty set and empty dictionary
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]