[Python-3000] question Re: Need help completing ABC pep (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Mon Apr 23 05:36:04 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] question Re: Need help completing ABC pep
- Next message: [Python-3000] Need help completing ABC pep
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/22/07, Samuele Pedroni <pedronis at openendsystems.com> wrote:
If we keep s % d (do we? reading the list archives and the peps didn't give an answer, I suppose it depends if PEP 3101 is accepted):
will it check if d is a Mapping or continue to use the current heuristics? I suppose this is a legitimate question for other corners of the language, std lib.
Any place that currently uses a heuristic should be changed to check for Mapping instead (actually, in this particular case BasicMapping, as the % operator doesn't need to iterate over the keys or items). And most places that currently check for a dict should probably check for a Mapping or BasicMapping as well. BUT BUT BUT -- this is only for places that already check (like s%d). Places that just plunge in and call getitem should continue to do so and should not be modified to require a flavor Mapping. Similarly, assignment to sys.stdout shouldn't be constrained to subclasses of io.IOBase; we can and should continue to use duck typing where it makes sense.
PS. I fully intend to be dropping s%d in favor of the PEP 3101 solution.
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-3000] question Re: Need help completing ABC pep
- Next message: [Python-3000] Need help completing ABC pep
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]