[Python-3000] Two proposals for a new list-like type: one modest, one radical (original) (raw)
Mike Klaas mike.klaas at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 20:42:02 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Two proposals for a new list-like type: one modest, one radical
- Next message: [Python-3000] Two proposals for a new list-like type: one modest, one radical
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/23/07, Daniel Stutzbach <daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com> wrote:
So you can see the performance of the BList in more detail, I've made several performance graphs available at the following link: http://stutzbachenterprises.com/blist/
Very cool. These detailed timings are very useful.
Might it be possible to include variance bars? A few of the graphs show your data structure faster than the list even for small N, and it would be great to see if it is meaningfully faster in these cases (if so, perhaps there are optimization possibilities for the current list data structure).
A quite glance at your results shows a few more cases where the blist faces problems, such no longer using Timsort, and so suffering in performance for sorted/reversed cases. That would be painful to give up in the built-in list implementation.
-Mike
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Two proposals for a new list-like type: one modest, one radical
- Next message: [Python-3000] Two proposals for a new list-like type: one modest, one radical
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]