[Python-3000] Fixing super anyone? (original) (raw)
Thomas Lee tom at vector-seven.com
Tue Apr 24 03:32:59 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Fixing super anyone?
- Next message: [Python-3000] Fixing super anyone?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Collin Winter wrote:
However, having the AST compiler expand
class A: def m(self): blah() super(self).m() blah() to class A: def m(self): super = superfactory(A) blah() super(self).m() blah()
I'm sold on the super(self) syntax and whacked together a quick & dirty patch. I made my changes in Objects/super.c, rather than the AST as you suggest. Determining this_class ('A' in your example) without touching the AST is obviously going to be problematic, but even with the AST how would you propose we determine the "current" class?
I've attached my patch irrespective. All relevant changes are within super_init.
Forgive the ignorance, I'm relatively new to this stuff :)
Cheers, Tom
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Fixing super anyone?
- Next message: [Python-3000] Fixing super anyone?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]