[Python-3000] ABC PEP isinstance issue Was: PEP 31XX: A Type Hierarchy for Numbers (and other algebraic entities) (original) (raw)
Jim Jewett jimjjewett at gmail.com
Thu Apr 26 00:10:23 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Suggested PEP 3108 addition
- Next message: [Python-3000] ABC PEP isinstance issue Was: PEP 31XX: A Type Hierarchy for Numbers (and other algebraic entities)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The current ABC proposal is to use isinstance as the test; Jeffrey Yaskin's numbers PEP highlighted the weakness there with a concrete example.
If you need to an abstraction less powerful than an existing ABC, you're out of luck; you can't just assert that the existing class is already sufficient, nor can you expect everyone else to use multiple annotations.
Short of allowing more bases surgery, we need a function parallel to isinstance, which at least makes 3rd-party registration possible. I suspect Phillip will say that we really need to make the ABCs generic functions... but I disagree; I'm not sure that 3rd-party adapters should even be allowed by default, but it should be simple to create an ABC that does take them.
Perhaps
def isexample(obj, ABC): for cls in obj.class.mro: result = ABC.meets(obj, cls) if result: return result return False
class Abstract...
# override this with a dictionary to allow 3rd-party registration
_good_enough = ()
@classmethod
def meets(cls, obj=None, objclass=None):
if objclass is cls: # covers isinstance
return obj
if objclass in cls._good_enough: # Nothing is, by default
return cls._good_enough.[objclass](obj)
@classmethod
def assert_sufficient(cls, objclass, adapter):
cls[objclass]=adapter
On 4/25/07, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at gmail.com> wrote:
If someone needs to split them later, they can use code like:: import numbers class IntegralDomain(Ring): ... numbers.Integral.bases = (IntegralDomain,) + numbers.Integral.bases
This only works with old-style classes, which are going away.
class Abstract1(object): pass class Abstract2(object): pass Abstract1.bases = (Abstract2,) + Abstract1.bases
Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#33>", line 1, in Abstract1.bases = (Abstract2,) + Abstract1.bases TypeError: bases assignment: 'Abstract2' deallocator differs from 'object'
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Suggested PEP 3108 addition
- Next message: [Python-3000] ABC PEP isinstance issue Was: PEP 31XX: A Type Hierarchy for Numbers (and other algebraic entities)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]